Politics
Politics
Politics
Politics
Focus
Politics
Politics
Politics
The Federal Council and parliament want to introduce an electronic identity (e-ID) scheme that would make it easier and more secure for us to use online services. But the plan is controversial. It will be put to the people on 7 March.
You can have six, sometimes eight characters, sometimes more. A jumble of letters and numbers. If you spend a lot of time on the internet, you will doubtless have to enter countless passwords, not to mention other login data like your name, email address or customer number. It’s the same rigmarole for anyone who wants to pay online, although security procedures often vary depending on the website.
In 2019, parliament approved new legislation aimed at “clearing the password jungle” and setting out clear rules. The Federal Act on Electronic Identification Services (E-ID Act), which will be put to voters on 7 March 2021, establishes the basis for electronic IDs. “We want to regulate the way people log in,” said Federal Councillor Karin Keller-Sutter in parliament, adding that people who use online services must be confident that statutory parameters are protecting them. What it certainly is not is a digital passport.
E-ID is designed to make it easier and more secure to carry out online transactions and use e-government applications, preventing confusion and offering protection against hacker attacks. It incorporates three security levels. The highest of these, facial recognition, would be used for sharing particularly sensitive data, e.g. health information or in relation to online tax statements or online voting. Indeed, e-voting could become fully digital through e-ID. In other words, all official voting papers and access data would be available online. Authorities would no longer have to send PINs by post, as was the case during the previous, now-aborted e-voting scheme. E-voting providers as well as voters would, in any event, be free to choose whether to make use of this government-approved identity scheme.
Implementation of the scheme would see the public and private sector work together. The government would check and register people’s identity and identifying characteristics. Private companies would issue e-IDs, as would cantonal and municipal authorities. Identity providers (IdP) would be responsible for cards, USB sticks and e-ID applications. An independent panel of experts, the Federal E-ID Committee (Eidcom), would approve and monitor IdPs.
By allocating responsibilities in this way, the Federal Council and a majority in parliament hope to ensure that e-services are workable and consumer-friendly. They argue that the private sector has greater customer proximity and can respond more flexibly to advances in technology. Karin Keller-Sutter: “Experiences in other countries show that exclusively government-driven solutions are less effective and successful, because the private sector chooses not to use them.”
This form of cooperation is not without its critics. It is the reason why Digital Society Switzerland, the campaign group Campax, the signature-gathering platform WeCollect, and civil society organisation PublicBeta have forced a referendum. They say that the government is failing in one of its key responsibilities and “bowing to the interests of the private sector”. Big banks, insurers, and firms with government links would be “acting like a passport office”. The initiators of the referendum believe that granting the private sector access to sensitive data is risky. In their opinion, companies primarily look out for their own interests and cannot be trusted. The government would have relatively little power to control them. Opponents of the new legislation also have doubts as to how voluntary the scheme would be. They fear that online services could pressure people into using e-ID. The SP and the Greens have already represented this view in parliament. It is a view which is shared by the Pirate Party, Switzerland’s public-sector trade union VPOD/SSP, senior citizens’ organisations, and other bodies.
Supporters of the new legislation dismiss these security concerns, insisting that the government will not lose control of the people’s data. They say that the E-ID Act goes above and beyond current provisions. For example, personal information cannot be used for other purposes or forwarded without prior consent. Selling such information would be against the law.
The Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner, Adrian Lobsiger, believes that the E-ID Act offers benefits with regard to data protection compliance. He explains that the E-ID Act would make things simpler, because banks, companies and authorities would no longer have to develop their own secure login systems. “It would lead to uniform statutory standards being applied to technical security and data protection,” he says. Lobsiger says that the good thing about what is being proposed is that the private sector would be funding and operating the e-ID scheme but the government would be setting the rules. If voters rejected it, Switzerland might have no other option but to recognise e-IDs offered exclusively by the private sector – also including providers unable to ensure the same type of data protection, e.g. Apple and Google. Lobsiger mentions that some cantonal authorities are already collaborating with SwissSign. These authorities use the company’s SwissID digital key to provide access to online government services.
SwissSign Group is part of a joint venture involving Swiss Post, SBB, Swisscom, Six and a number of major banks and insurance companies. It would be keen on issuing its own e-ID – but sceptics such as Anita Fetz (SP/Basel-Stadt) are critical. In a parliamentary debate, the former member of the Council of States said that a private monopoly is the last thing that Switzerland needs. Justice Minister Karin Keller-Sutter dismissed these comments as “illogical”. “If that is a monopoly, what would you call the government?” A number of providers from the private sector competing to develop their own applications is exactly what we want, she said.
E-ID is a cornerstone of the digital transformation, say supporters of the E-ID Act. Switzerland cannot afford to miss the digital boat and not make up ground on other countries. Switzerland is indeed lagging behind comparable countries in e-government. It risks falling even further behind, warn experts. This is Switzerland’s very last chance to keep control of its citizens’ identification data, declared Ruedi Noser (FDP/Zurich) in the smaller chamber, adding that any delay would play into the hands of Apple, Google, Facebook and Amazon.
On 10 July 2020, the Council of the Swiss Abroad (CSA), referred to as the “Parliament of the Fifth Switzerland”, decided to back the new legislation and vote yes in the referendum. However, with 37 to 26 in favour (and 18 abstentions), the decision was far from unanimous.
Implementing e-ID would involve a one-off outlay of 7.9 million francs. This money would fund development of the system as well as the establishment of a federal service in charge of transmitting identity and verification information. According to the Federal Office of Justice (FOJ), operating the system is likely to cost around 3.5 million francs a year. However, this would be covered by administrative fees and would therefore have no effect on the government’s balance sheet.
Comments
Comments :
Der Bund muss die einzige Stelle sein wo meine Daten hinterlegt sind was, was sie jetzt schon sind.
Der Bund garantiert mit der Vergabe einer E-ID, dass ich der bin den ich vorgebe zu sein. Der Rest funktioniert über meine E-ID die für alle Anderen als Identifikation funktioniert.
So sind meine Daten geschützt, was jetzt auch sein sollten, es kann kein Missbrauch damit betrieben werden. Wenn Andere meine Daten wollen müssen sie sie von mir direkt abholen und ich kann entscheiden ob ich sie geben will oder nicht. Nicht über dunkle Wege einkaufen.
In my perfect world, the federal government would offer a secure and convenient eID. However, I understand the real-world arguments against it. The city of Zug may have found a realistic solution if people are willing to spend some time learning about distributed ledger technology (blockchain).
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/collection/egovernment/document/swiss-city-zug-issues-ethereum-blockchain-based-eids#:~:text=Since%20November%202017%20the%20Swiss,app%20and%20an%20online%20portal.
Grüss Gott
Ich würde E-ID von E-Voting trennen, weil ich denke, dass E-ID kann man vieleicht in Inland brauchen, das E-Voting ist besonderes für die Auslandschweizer sehr attraktiv. Mit der Post abstimmen ist ja langsam und der Abstimmungstermin ist jeweils vorbei . Mit freundlichen Grüssen, Kokob
La Suisse 2021: Ne savez-vous donc pas qu'ily a des personnes agées qui ne comprennent rien avec les ordinateurs et les téléphones tablettes !
Ich will meine Daten NICHT in den Händen von irgendwelchen pirvaten Interessen sehen.
Und was von Versprechungen zu halten ist, dass die Daten sicher seien in den Händen dieser Anbieter, das sah man in der Vergangenheit immer wieder. Und die Kontrollen durch den Staat kann man getrost vergessen, das funktioniert ja nicht einmal bei der Kontrolle der Restaurants, des Tierschutzes, der Lebensmittelsicherheit und und und.
Weshalb soll sie denn bei den Datenkraken funktionieren. Wer glaubt denn das?
NEIN zu dieser Vorlage und NEIN zum Gegenvorschlag.
https://x-road.global/xroad-world-map
N.B. Je n'ai absolument aucun intérêt personnel ni aucun lien avec l'entreprise.
Une spécialiste reconnue au Québec, Michelle Blanc, m'a suggéré, en lui parlant de ce projet de e-ID, que la Suisse jette un œil sur: X-Road® Data Exchange Layer.
Cordialement, Eric W. Schaffner (Suisse au Québec)
Michelle Blanc M.Sc.
Consultante conférencière et auteure stratégie de gestion et marketing internet. Mon titre académique est http://M.Sc. commerce électronique
Ich bin auch der Meinung des Bundesrats / Karin Keller-Sutter.
Eine E-ID, die von einem Privaten organsiert wird, will ich nicht. Der Staat kann die Sicherheit NICHT garantieren, obwohl es gesagt wird. Werde daher dagegen stimmen.
Ein Fass ohne Boden wird wieder aufgemacht für das Schweizer Volk! Die Schweiz ist auch nicht in der Lage, ein System auf die Beine zu stellen, das den Auslandschweizern ermöglicht, an Abstimmungen teilzunehmen! In solche Systemen werden Millionen verheizt und am Schluss werden sie wieder abgezogen und vernichtet und der Souverän hat bezahlt. Der Bundesrat ist wie so oft völlig überfordert und das Wichtigste: Sie haben keine Ahnung! Man kann nicht Politiker zum Oberhaupt machen und sie versteht nichts von der Materie. also muss es ein klares NEIN sein am 7.März 2021. Leider kann ich nicht abstimmen, denn die Unterlagen werden wie immer zu spät kommen.
Bonjour.
Le problème du délai de renvoi des votations viennent plus du pays où vous habité.
J'habite en France et je reçois les enveloppes de vote un mois a deux mois a l'avance.Donc largement le temps de réagir.
Moi même, je suis contre l'E-ID car le système électronique ne pourra jamais être sur à cent pour cent.
Erhalten auch die Auslandschweizer eine E-ID? Kann man damit entlich elektronisch abstimmen. Falls nein, was soll für uns Auslandschweizer
Eine E-ID können grundsätzlich alle beantragen. Eine E-ID führt aber nicht automatisch zum E-Voting. Es ist lediglich so, dass die E-ID eine künftige E-Voting-Lösung erleichtern könnte.
Derzeit hat die Schweiz sämtliche E-Voting-Versuche sistiert: Niemand kann momentan an nationalen Urnengängen elektronisch abstimmen. In Kürze sollen aber erneut E-Voting-Versuche zugelassen werden. Die "Schweizer Revue" wir in ihrer nächsten Ausgabe über den aktuellen Stand zum Thema E-Voting berichten.