Menu
stage img
  • Economy

The crux of Swissness

16.03.2017 – Matthias Pfander

The new Swissness Act has been in force since the start of the year. The food industry has had to modify packaging and recipes as a result.

The pork in the mini cordon bleu comes from Switzerland, as do the cheese and ham used in it. Until now the convenience food producer Bofrost has labelled this product with a Swiss flag in its catalogue. However, that now has to stop owing to the coating. The breadcrumbs do not come from Switzerland and under the new Swissness regulations the product may no longer be advertised as Swiss. The new law stipulates that at least 80 % of the weight of ingredients in food products must come from Switzerland in order for it to be marketed as Swiss. The coating accounts for 25 % of the weight of Bofrost’s mini cordon bleu.

Many Swiss companies in the food industry have been forced to change their recipes, packaging or both owing to the new legislation, including the muesli manufacturer Bio-Familia. The company would have needed to remove the Swiss cross from 110 of 130 different product packaging types owing to the new provisions. By modifying 50 recipes, it was able to leave the flag symbol on the packaging. Niklaus Iten of Bio-Familia reveals that intensive discussions took place within the company about whether to make the changes or to simply relinquish the Swiss cross in future. In the end the company decided to retain the symbol, fearing a fall in demand from abroad otherwise. “Export customers clearly indicated to us that they wouldn’t buy without the Swiss cross,” remarks Iten.

Juices or French fries

The new law has also forced the food producer Hero to take action. The Swiss logo has been removed from 70 products, including pasta sold under the Napoli brand. While it is made in Switzerland, there are not sufficient supplies of durum wheat semolina here and it is therefore imported. Further examples include Nestlé removing the Swiss cross from 80 products, including the Thomy and Leisi brands. The Swiss cross has had to be taken off Ramseier juices containing exotic fruit. The logo has been removed from the French fries in Frigemo’s convenience food range. Guarantees could not be provided that they consisted of 80 % Swiss potatoes. However, the herbal sweets manufacturer Ricola, which exploits its Swiss origin very heavily in marketing, is only talking about making selective modifications to recipes.

Many companies are critical of the new legislation. Hochdorf, the milk processing company, believes it focuses too one-sidedly on the origin of raw materials and too little on production in Switzerland. Daniel Bloch, CEO of Camille Bloch, which makes Ragusa chocolate, complains: “The cumbersome demands on the origin of raw materials create new obstacles for companies manufacturing in Switzerland.”

Consumer protection representative Sarah Stalder has little sympathy with such views: “Complaining now just shows that food producers are keen to cash in on the Swissness bonus but want to leave everything as it was,” remarks the head of the Consumer Protection Foundation (SKS). The industry has had enough time to adapt to the changes or to apply for exemptions. The Federal Office for Agriculture also rejects the claims: “The consequences of the Swissness law are being overdramatised,” says Vice-Director Dominique Kohli. He is unaware of any company forced to make job cuts as a result so far.

Matthias Pfander is business editor at the “Tages-Anzeiger”

The new Swissness regulations

When can a product be marketed as Swiss?

Natural products: For minerals (such as salt), plants, fruit, game and fish, the place of extraction, harvest or hunting is the decisive factor. In the case of meat from the rearing of livestock, the animals must have spent most of their lives in Switzerland. With animal products, such as eggs, milk and honey, the animals must be kept in Switzerland.

Food products: At least 80 % of the weight must be made up of raw materials from Switzerland and the main processing stages must take place here. If an ingredient is not available in Switzerland – such as cacao or pineapple – or not to the required quality standard or in sufficient quantity, it is excluded or only partially taken into account. Low quantities of additives, such as salt, herbs and yeast, are not included. Federal government has also provisionally approved 58 exemptions, including candy sugar and protein powder.

Industrial products: 60 % of manufacturing costs (such as with watches) must be incurred in Switzerland and the main manufacturing stages must take place here. The costs of research and development, quality assurance and certification are also taken into account.

Services: With regard to services, the provider must have its administrative headquarters in Switzerland and also carry out its main activities here. (map)

Photo: Keystone

Comments

×

First name, surname and place/country of residence is required

Enter valid name

Valid email is required!

valid email address required

Comment is required!

Comment rules have to be accepted.

Please accept

* These fields are required.

Comments :

  • user
    Natalie 18.07.2017 At 16:21
    What I appreciate about these new regulations are the conversations food manufacturers are needing to have around the merits of choosing local resources over distant ones, from an ecological point of view. For example, why is my relish in Canada made in India? It's not like we don't have cucumbers here! What a waste of greenhouse gases!
    Show Translation
  • user
    Kurt Müller 23.03.2017 At 15:31
    Heisst das jetzt das es ab sofort keine Schweizer Schokolade mehr gibt? Speziell keine mit 80% Kakao? Oder muss die Schweiz jetzt Kakaobäume pflanzen, möglichst gentechnisch dem hiesigen Klima angepasst?
    Show Translation
    • user
      ER 04.04.2017 At 05:24
      Tja... es fehlt einfach an normalen Menschenverstand... alles sehr wischiwaschi und diejenigen die einfach beste Qualität liefern sind nun bestraft... und die bauernschlauen die da meinen andere über den Tisch zu ziehen mit Unwahrheiten markten, denen kommt man noch entgegen.... Die Verwaltungen sind zu gross und zu bequem und sind mehr und mehr nur an ihrer eigenen Tasche interessiert ....
      Show Translation
  • user
    PHOSITA 22.03.2017 At 10:04
    This is an excellent development.
    The Swiss label stands for quality worldwide, even at a subconscious level among consumers who know nothing about Switzerland. Since companies abuse the brand and dilute it, it is necessary to protect and strengthen it, and the only way to achieve that is through enforcing standards.
    It is important to remember that this act not only protects Swiss industries, it also protects consumers by improving transparency with regards to the origin and practices used in preparing the products and services we buy.
    Companies that can no longer use the Swiss label due to not meeting the standards of the Swissness Act, are not discriminated against. They can still protect their brands with trademarks and customer satisfaction.
    Show Translation
  • user
    PHOSITA 22.03.2017 At 10:04
    This is an excellent development.
    The Swiss label stands for quality worldwide, even at a subconscious level among consumers who know nothing about Switzerland. Since companies abuse the brand and dilute it, it is necessary to protect and strengthen it, and the only way to achieve that is through enforcing standards.
    It is important to remember that this act not only protects Swiss industries, it also protects consumers by improving transparency with regards to the origin and practices used in preparing the products and services we buy.
    Companies that can no longer use the Swiss label due to not meeting the standards of the Swissness Act, are not discriminated against. They can still protect their brands with trademarks and customer satisfaction.
    Show Translation
  • user
    r graf 20.03.2017 At 02:06
    Why dont you guys pull your heads out of your asses and smell the coffee
    Show Translation
  • user
    Magnus Kilian 19.03.2017 At 19:25
    Protectionism is not a very good idea, and that is what this law enshrines. "Made in Switzerland" always was a good recommendation for high quality items, whether the materials used were of indigenous origin or the product manufactured from imported items. Much more problematic however, is the loss of Swiss identity and colloquial language. I have lived in Canada for sixty years and have come back to Switzerland for visits more often than I can remember. Somehow many parts of Swiss towns and cities now look very much like North American ones, especially when it comes to the names of shops. as well as that, the language is rapidly changing from Swiss German Dialects, French, Italian or Romantsch to English expressions. One used to go "Einkaufen", now one goes "shopping". What used to be the "Fliegertruppen" is now the Swiss Airforce and "Swisspost" is an expression that describes a "Schweizer Pfahl", whatever that is supposed to be. Protecting, to a certain degree, one country's manufacturing industry is laudable, providing one is aware of the global interdependence in commerce. however, protecting one's country's unique identity is much more important, at least in my opinion.
    Show Translation
  • user
    Helene Walton 19.03.2017 At 15:26
    I see both sides, however, we do not live in an insular world. I find the new Swissness regulations a little extreme. What will this do the availability and the cost of the products? We are all interdependent when it comes to world trade. Switzerland cannot live in a bubble or we will all feel the economic repercussions.
    I agree that products with any Swiss designation need to have high standards of quality control but not to the detriment of Swiss manufacturers and the economy.
    Show Translation
  • user
    Norbert 19.03.2017 At 11:27
    ... klasse, eine andere Art des Protektionismus. Clever gemacht. Die USA und Mr. Trump werden sich fragen "verdammt warum sind wir noch nicht darauf gekommen".
    Show Translation
    • user
      Erwin Balli-Ramos 19.03.2017 At 18:55
      Sehr geehrter Herr Norbert
      Die USA und damit auch Trump werden sich diese Fragen wohl nie stellen, weil schon allein diese nie auf so etwas kommen würden. Mehr noch, die Qualität ihrer Produkte können Sie auch mit wer weiss was für einen Verpackungs-Aufdruck verbessern.
      Show Translation
  • user
    LEON DOSSE 18.03.2017 At 22:13
    ......und die Chinesen werden weiterhin Produkte mit Schweizerkreuz und Swiss produzieren
    Show Translation
    • user
      Jörn W. Malek 19.03.2017 At 18:11
      Hier in Costa Rica hat jemand von der Botschaft Victorynox Sackmesser, identisch mit Schweizerkreuz, in einem grossen Baustoffanbieter mit Namen EPA gefunden, welche alle in China hergestellt wurden. Wie wollen die Gesetzgeber soetwas in über 200 Ländern der Welt kontrollieren? Die Schweizer Botschaft hier erreichte auf jeden Fall, dass die Messer aus dem Geschäft entfernt wurden. Vermulich werden sie jetzt in einer Filiale in Venezuela oder Uruguay verkauft, oder in einem Land wo es keine Schweizer Botschaft gibt. Auf alle Fälle viel Glück beim durchsetzen dieses Gesetzes.

      Es kommt mir ähnlich vor wie hier in Costa Rica die Geschwindigkeits-Vorschriften auf der Autobahn. Alle fahren so schnell sie wollen, denn erwischt zu werden ist so selten wie ein Los in der Lotterie zu gewinnen. Ich nehme an, die Polizei hier benützt vielleicht einmal pro Woche eine der wenigen Radar-Pistolen die sie besitzen.

      Als Schweizer hier im Ausland, fällt uns eventuell auf, dass der Gegenstand nicht in der Schweiz hergestellt wurde, aber ein Nichtschweizer, weiss zum Teil nicht einmal was das Schweizerkreuz bedeutet. Wenn sie im Süden von den USA Benzin tanken und der Schwarze, welche das Benzin einfüllt fragt, woher du kommst, und du sagst "from Switzerland", wird er vermutlich antworten: "Oh, that's in New Mexicio, right". Vermutlich kann er gar nicht lesen.

      Also viel Glück mit dem neuen Gestetz. Hier in Costa Rica, wenn jemand etwas dummes macht, sagt man: "Para tonto no hay que estudiar" oder auf Deutsch: Um dumm zu sein muss man nicht studieren. Das Gesetz hat sicher eine gute Absicht, und wie man sagt, zählt ja diese. Dass es nicht kontrollierbar ist, ist jedoch dumm.
      Show Translation
    • user
      Peter Siegenthaler 19.03.2017 At 18:31
      Bin ja gespannt ob Wenger das Schweizerkreuz von deren "Swiss Gear" Gepäckstücken, welche alle Made in China sind, entfernt. Wohl kaum, da diese ja u.A. hier in Nordamerika angeboten werden, wo Swissnessgesetze wenig Wirkung haben.
      Show Translation
  • user
    Nancy 18.03.2017 At 18:18
    Yes, St. Ives lotions and face products say they are made in Geneva. I returned to live in Geneva for 18 years - never could find the factory there.
    Show Translation
  • user
    Hans-Peter Senn 18.03.2017 At 17:52
    A.Bachmann hat recht wegen der Schweizerfahne und dem Namen "SWISS"die für alles gebraucht werden ,vom in Wisconsin gemachtem Käse bis zur Chemischen Reinigung!!
    Komischerweise lässt man dies zu weil man wohl angst hat dem "Grossen Bruder" auf den Nerf zu treten!!
    Aber als Schweizer der schon 32 Jahre in den USA lebt und 49 Jahre für eine "echte"Schweizer Firma gearbeitet hat ist es oft mühsam zu sehen mit was für welchen S,,,,,produkten unser Schweizerkreuz und der Name SWISS in Verbindung gebracht wird.
    Show Translation
    • user
      Evelyn Eugster 24.03.2017 At 15:25
      Just a thought from a Swiss Canadian - Expand to establish and publish lists of international products bearing some component of Swiss input. Become a high quality standardization office that can award approval. Subscribers can seek and purchase quality products and earn points, give feedback, create communities of fund raising initiatives - all based on increasing the traditional merits.
      Show Translation
  • user
    Walter S UK 18.03.2017 At 04:09
    Finally a statement - thanks to all politicians and people how helped putting this in place. It will expose the companies with little real swiss spirit.
    Show Translation
  • user
    A. Bachmann 18.03.2017 At 03:26
    What about all the products that use the Swiss flag worldwide and especially in the USA? All these products make use of our Swiss flag with absolutely no relation to Switzerland at all. I see shampoo bottles and liquid soap and many other cosmetic products including also food products In stores here in the USA in stores often, even first aid kits that accidentally use a white instead of red cross, and so on. I doubt any of these products have even close to 80% Swiss ingredients and they all profit from the Swiis (quality reflecting) logo. Anybody going to go after those non swiss companies??
    Show Translation
    • user
      Debbie Schoenberger 20.03.2017 At 15:40
      I think that's a great idea. For years I've been incensed that American companies use the word "Swiss" on products that aren't Swiss. A lit of those products are inferior.
      Show Translation
    • user
      Debbie Schoenberger 20.03.2017 At 15:40
      I think that's a great idea. For years I've been incensed that American companies use the word "Swiss" on products that aren't Swiss. A lit of those products are inferior.
      Show Translation
    • user
      Nick 20.03.2017 At 21:20
      Dann sollte man wohl auch die Unsitte anprangern, dass bei vielen Erste Hilfe Stellen ein Schild mit weissem Kreuz auf rot an Stelle von rotem Kreuz auf weiss ausgehängt ist.
      Wenn die Schweizer Flagge international geschützt ist, dann sollte man gegen die kommerziellen Sünder vorgehen können. Dazu brauchen wir eine zentrale Meldestelle, wo man Bilder einschicken kann.
      Show Translation
  • user
    A. Bachmann 18.03.2017 At 03:22
    What about all the products that use the Swiss flag worldwide and especially in the USA? All these products make use of our Swiss flag with absolutely no relation to Switzerland at all. I see shampoo bottles and liquid soap and many other cosmetic products including also food products In stores here in the USA in stores often, even first aid kits that accidentally use a white instead of red cross, and so on. I doubt any of these products have even close to 80% Swiss ingredients and they all profit from the Swiis (quality reflecting) logo. Anybody going to go after those non swiss companies??
    Show Translation
    • user
      Theresa Anacker 19.03.2017 At 19:28
      Well stated! "Swiss Ice Tea" is an example. There is nothing Swiss about ice tea! Companies are using the word "Swiss" like they use the word "artisan". Just another advertising strategy to infer integrity of their product. The legislation would need to apply globally to have any effect. Forcing compliance on Switzerland alone seems like a costly, bureaucratic nightmare!
      Show Translation
    • user
      Witschi 19.03.2017 At 19:35
      After living in the US for 30 years, I can assure you that 98% of all Americans could not pick out CH on a map, and are even less aware of any Swiss-cross to quality relationship. Never mind that a fair amount of 'quality' in Swiss products is just as much a result of constant media marketing and does not hold up when looked at a bit closer.
      Show Translation
    • user
      Bob Martinek 19.03.2017 At 21:37
      Seems to me that Switzerland will experience some unintended consequences from this law. Swiss companies without enough content that drop the flag is tantamount to Switzerland losing exposure to the world. Artificial shortages will drive up Swiss prices making their products un-affordable in foreign markets.
      Show Translation
    • user
      Sylvette Lau 26.03.2017 At 03:57
      All these comments are SO right! And what about the first care or medical outfits that use the SWISS flag instead of the "red cross". on life guard T-shirts, first aid kits etc. Either they are ignorant and stupid or... they do it on purpose and Switzerland should object to that use.
      Show Translation
    • user
      Verena Zbinden 20.04.2017 At 18:47
      Congratulations! What about all the Emergency Rooms and Hospitals in the United States that are using the Swiss Cross. Let's start there! Verena, Texas
      Show Translation
    • user
      Verena Zbinden 20.04.2017 At 18:47
      Congratulations! What about all the Emergency Rooms and Hospitals in the United States that are using the Swiss Cross. Let's start there! Verena, Texas
      Show Translation
  • user
    Wilfried Gsell Canada 17.03.2017 At 21:35
    Super , hoch lebe die Bürokratie , es scheint ja auf der ganzen Welt kaum mehr etwas richtig zu funktionieren ohne das es für alles einen extra Angestellten braucht.
    Es werden Berichte erstellt , kontrolliert , Sitzungen abgehalten und neuen Weisungen vom Staat verfolgt .Die anfallenden Mehrkosten der produzierenden Firmen verteilen sich dann elegant und fast unmerklich auf den Verbraucher.
    Mein Unmut kommt nicht von ungefähr , ich lernte in einer Gross Schweizer Firma mit 1000 Bürolisten / 2000 Arbeiter welche erwartungsgemäss bald unter gegangen ist. Vor meiner Pensionierung in einem Schweizer Staats Betrieb welcher in den 80er Jahren mit 20 Angestellten perfekt funktionierte arbeiten unterdessen mit dem gleichen Auftrag Volumen gegen 50 Angestellte.
    ( Umständliche Anforderungen und Hürden )wie in Ihrem Bericht oben zitiert !
    Show Translation
  • user
    Peter Kuederli 17.03.2017 At 20:41
    Dann entfernt endlich den Namenszug SWISS und das Schweizerkreuz von der Lufthansatochter. Wir brauchen dieses schlechte Image nicht. Auch die neue Lounge welche fuer X Millionen gebaut wird in Zuerich brauchen wir nicht, so lassen wir uns naemlich genausowenig kaufen, wie man Freunde nicht kaufen kann.
    Show Translation
    • user
      Charlotte Woerner 18.03.2017 At 04:27
      Das ist nun einmal ein Wort! Das sollte einer vor Gericht durchsetzen, muesste durchkommen beim neuen Swissness-Flaeggli Gesetz oder man widersprich sich und alle koennen weiterfahren wie bisher - die SWISS wird weiterhin weltweit anlanden mit dem helvetischen Kreuz bemalt - aber der Grosse Kanton drin! Ein Luxemburgerli made in Zuerich - haha
      Show Translation
    • user
      U. Rauen 19.03.2017 At 20:46
      Ich bin total einverstanden , dass die swissairline nichts mit der Schweiz zu tun hat. Mit einem deutschen Besitzer sollte das Wort Swiss nicht erlaubt sein. Das einzige schweizerische bei dieser Fluggesellschaft ist ( mit viel Glueck ) ab und zu auf ein schweizer Crewmitglied zu treffen . Die Qualitaet dieser Fluggesellschaft ist leider zu ca. 80% deutsch. Es waere schoen , wenn unser Land wieder eine Airline haette die des Schweizer Namens wuerdig waere.
      Show Translation
    • user
      Peter Siegenthaler 19.03.2017 At 23:55
      Bemerkenswerterweise wurde der Swissair vom Departement Leuenberger verboten, die Winglets der MD-11 mit dem Schweizerkreuz zu bemalen weil sie "keine staatliche Fluglinie" war.
      Show Translation
  • user
    Kati. Lyon-Villiger, Canada 17.03.2017 At 18:48
    That is great. Absolutely wonderful. Now to ensure Swissness completely, let us add that at least 51% of the Board of Directors must be Swiss as well. You can increase your board in numbers to get to the right proportions. Look at German and Swedish boards. Not that we need to emulate them, but in this instance, they have got it right. HOP SCHWYZ! REACH FOR THE STARS!
    Show Translation
    • user
      Georg Vyskocil, Prag 18.03.2017 At 09:41
      Anstatt lang und breit über swiss-made zu schreiben, führt für CH Pensionierte Minimalbetrag von CHF 2500/Monat ein. Solche Geste wird garantiert niemand als Originalzeichen bezweifeln und was noch wichtiger, übertreffen. Everything else is nothing but a rat race.
      Show Translation
    • user
      Roger Ruppanner 10.04.2017 At 16:47
      Je suis 25% italien; est-ce que je vais pouvoir garder mon passeport suisse?
      Show Translation
    • user
      Natalie 18.07.2017 At 16:06
      Roger: I don't think Kati is questioning the definition of Swiss nationality...you have a Swiss passport, so you would be deemed a valuable member of a Swiss Board of Directors, certainly!
      Show Translation
top